Cerebral Dominance and University education
Keywords:
Cerebral dominance, higher education.Abstract
The discoveries neuroscience about cerebral dominance and its multiple applications for life have been increasing. There are many research works on the application of neuroscience in educational improvement, although there are few at the higher education level. This work had two purposes; the first one was identify and compare the cerebral dominance profile of phycology students of UNAN-Managua from different academic years (2009, 2010, 2013). The second one, was verify the cerebral dominance in a sample of students at the beginning and end of their undergraduate studies. The investigation results show a simple dominance, the preference of Left Brain Hemisphere particularly of Left cortical; Lower Dominance on Right Brain Hemisphere specially of Right Limbic quadrant. On the other side, based on the comparison of scores obtained from the pre and post test, it observes that there are no changes related to the dominance of the different quadrants of both the Left Brain Hemisphere and Left Brain Hemisphere. To evaluate the tendency to use the four quadrants by students, according to the Whole Brain Model by Ned Hermann (1989) the Chalvin test (1993) was used, a self-administrated instrument which is answered within 15 or 20 minutes, this consists of 22 items (with four response options, of which one or two are chosen) related to the study activities and daily life. The answers are transferred to a correction template and, added the scores per quadrant, the profile is obtained.
Downloads
References
Calle, M. G., Cleves, N. R., & Burgos, B. M. (2008). Relación entre los perfiles de dominancia cerebral de los estudiantes de primero, quinto y décimo semestres delPrograma de Bacteriología y Laboratorio Clínico de la Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca. Nova,6(9), 40. doi:10.22490/24629448.395
Caza. P., (2005) Modelo de los cuadrantes generales (disponible en: http://www.rmm.cl/index_
Chalvin. M. J., (2003): Los dos cerebros en el aula. (3ª. ed.) Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Traducción: Ma. Victoria de la Cruz.
Gómez. A. Recio. R. Gómez. D. Lóez. H. (2010): Diagnóstico de estilo de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios de nuevo ingreso basado en la dominancia cerebral. Revista Estilos de aprendizaje, num. 5, vol 5, 2010. (Disponible en http://www.uned.es/revistaestilosdeaprendizaje/numero_5/articulos/
lsr_5_articulo_4.pdf). Consultada en abril 2012.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2008). Neurociencia y conducta. Madrid: Pearson Educacio?n.
Martínez. M. (1992). El proceso creador a la luz de la neurociencia. Publicación: Comportamiento 1993. V2 n1. (Disponible en: http://www.comportamiento.dsm.usb.ve/revista/vol2_n1_93.pdf
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (2016). Brantford, Ontario: W. Ross MacDonald School Resource Services Library.
Rómulo. O, Marval. O., (2000): Avances de las neurociencias. Implicaciones en la educación. Revista Agenda académica 2007. v7, n2. (Disponible en: http://www.virtual.unal.edu.co/cursos/humanas/mtria_edu/2021076/und_1/
pdf/lectura3m1estacion2.pdf. Consultada en enero 2010).
Rojas, G., Salas, R., & Jimenez, C. (2006). Estilos De Aprendizaje Y Estilos De Pensamiento Entre Estudiantes Universitarios. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia),32(1). doi:10.4067/s0718-07052006000100004